1974 formula 400 firebird

Every Washington Redskins/Football Team/Commanders Playoff Game (Super Bowl Era)

2023.03.30 15:56 therealphoodie Every Washington Redskins/Football Team/Commanders Playoff Game (Super Bowl Era)

Home:
Season Round Opponent Venue Result Record Win %
1972 Divisional Green Bay Packers Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 16-3 1-0 1.000
1972 NFC Championship Dallas Cowboys Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 26-3 2-0 1.000
1982 Wild Card Detroit Lions Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 31-7 3-0 1.000
1982 Divisional Minnesota Vikings Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 21-7 4-0 1.000
1982 NFC Championship Dallas Cowboys Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 31-17 5-0 1.000
1983 Divisional Los Angeles Rams Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 51-7 6-0 1.000
1983 NFC Championship San Francisco 49ers Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 24-21 7-0 1.000
1984 Divisional Chicago Bears Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium L 19-23 7-1 .875
1986 Wild Card Los Angeles Rams Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 19-7 8-1 .889
1987 NFC Championship Minnesota Vikings Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 17-10 9-1 .900
1991 Divisional Atlanta Falcons Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 24-7 10-1 .909
1991 NFC Championship Detroit Lions Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium W 41-10 11-1 .917
1999 Wild Card Detroit Lions Jack Kent Cooke Stadium W 27-13 12-1 .923
2012 Wild Card Seattle Seahawks FedExField L 14-24 12-2 .857
2015 Wild Card Green Bay Packers FedExField L 18-35 12-3 .800
2020 Wild Card Tampa Bay Buccaneers FedExField L 23-31 12-4 .750
Away:
Season Round Opponent Venue Result Record Win %
1971 Divisional San Francisco 49ers Candlestick Park L 20-24 0-1 .000
1973 Divisional Minnesota Vikings Metropolitan Stadium L 20-27 0-2 .000
1974 Divisional Los Angeles Rams Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum L 10-19 0-3 .000
1976 Divisional Minnesota Vikings Metropolitan Stadium L 20-35 0-4 .000
1986 Divisional Chicago Bears Soldier Field W 27-13 1-4 .200
1986 NFC Championship New York Giants Giants Stadium L 0-17 1-5 .167
1987 Divisional Chicago Bears Soldier Field W 21-17 2-5 .286
1990 Wild Card Philadelphia Eagles Veterans Stadium W 20-6 3-5 .375
1990 Divisional San Francisco 49ers Candlestick Park L 10-28 3-6 .333
1992 Wild Card Minnesota Vikings Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome W 24-7 4-6 .400
1992 Divisional San Francisco 49ers Candlestick Park L 13-20 4-7 .364
1999 Divisional Tampa Bay Buccaneers Raymond James Stadium L 13-14 4-8 .333
2005 Wild Card Tampa Bay Buccaneers Raymond James Stadium W 17-10 5-8 .385
2005 Divisional Seattle Seahawks Qwest Field L 10-20 5-9 .357
2007 Wild Card Seattle Seahawks Qwest Field L 14-35 5-10 .333
Super Bowls:
Season (Super Bowl) Opponent Venue Location Result Record Win %
1972 (VII) Miami Dolphins Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Los Angeles, CA L 7-14 0-1 .000
1982 (XVII) Miami Dolphins Rose Bowl Pasadena, CA W 27-17 1-1 .500
1983 (XVIII) Los Angeles Raiders Tampa Stadium Tampa, FL L 9-38 1-2 .333
1987 (XXII) Denver Broncos Jack Murphy Stadium San Diego, CA W 42-10 2-2 .500
1991 (XXVI) Buffalo Bills Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome Minneapolis, MN W 37-24 3-2 .600
Final Tally:
Games Record Win %
Home 12-4 .750
Away 5-10 .333
Super Bowls 3-2 .600
Totals 20-16 .556
submitted by therealphoodie to Commanders [link] [comments]


2023.03.30 15:02 Shagrrotten The Non-English Language Movie Tournament: Round 1

We have arrived here at the non-English language tournament, FG. This will be a long tournament, as we had nearly 300 movies nominated from all over the world (though as to be expected from the history of cinema the most nominated countries were France, Italy, and Japan), so this will take us over the next few months. As always, the polls will last for one day, so get your votes in and come back tomorrow for the results and the next battle.
Letterboxd list of all the participating movies: https://boxd.it/lOu1o
Results of Round 1
8 1/2 (1963) - Italy (48) beat Martyrs (2008) - France (26), Elevator to the Gallows (1958) - France (11), and The Aviator’s Wife (1981) - France (5)
The Battle of Algiers (1966) - Italy/Algeria (28) beat 3-Iron (2004) - South Korea (7), Embrace of the Serpent (2015) - Colombia (5), and Massacre Time (Tempo di massacro) (1966) - Italy (2)
The 400 Blows (1959) - France (34) beat Memories of Murder (2003) - South Korea (32), Battleship Potemkin (1925) - Russia (21), and Eyes Without a Face (1960) - France (12)
Metropolis (1927) - Germany (51), beat Fanny and Alexander (1982) - Sweden (32), 5 Centimeters Per Second (2007) - Japan (16), and The Bothersome Man (2006) - Norway
Fantastic Planet (1973) - France (23) beat Minari (2020) - USA (16), A Brighter Summer Day (1991) - Taiwan (14), and The Conformist (1970) - Italy (13)
Mirror (1975) - Russia (21) beat Farewell My Concubine (1993) - China (10), The Cranes Are Flying (1957) - Russia (10), and A City of Sadness (1989) - Taiwan (6)
Fists of Fury (1972) - Hong Kong (21) beat A Man Escaped (1956) - France (15), The Cremator (1969) - Czech Republic (9), and Moolaade (2004) - Senegal (5)
My Neighbour Totoro (1988) - Japan (44) beat A Separation (2011) - Iran (22), Fitzcarraldo (1982) - Germany (20), and The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (2007) - France (12)
Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind (1984) - Japan (25) beat The Double Life of Véronique (1991) - Poland (22), A Short Film About Love (1988) - Poland (11), and Gangs of Wasseypur (2012) - India (6)
Night and Fog (1956) - France (14) beat A Very Long Engagement (2004) - France (8), The Emigrants (1971) - Sweden (6), and Girlhood (2014) - France (4)
Nosferatu (1922) - Germany (39) beat Aguirre, the Wrath of God (1972) - Germany (26), Godzilla (1954) - Japan (24), and The Exterminating Angel (1962) - Mexico (10)
Nosferatu: Phantom der Nacht (1979) - Germany (36) beat Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (1974) - Germany (21), Goodbye Lenin (2003) - Germany (12), and The Foreign Duck, The Native Duck and God in a Coin Locker (2007) - Japan (5)
The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (2009) - Sweden (17), beat All About My Mother (1999) - Spain (16), Grand Illusion (1937) - France (16), and O-bi, O-ba: The End of Civilization (1985) - Poland (3)
Grave of the Fireflies (1988) - Japan (33) beat Amarcord (1973) - Italy (14), One Cut of the Dead (2017) - Japan (10), and The Green Ray (1986) - France (9)
Amelie (2001) - France (79) beat The Handmaiden (2016) - South Korea (40), Only Yesterday (1991) - Japan (10), and Hamlet (1964) - Russia (6)
Harakiri (1962) - Japan (33) beat The Hidden Fortress (1958) - Japan (22), Amour (2012) - Austria (12), and Ordet (1955) - Denmark (10)
Andrei Rublev (1966) - Russia (29) beat The Holy Mountain (1973) - Mexico (26), Headhunters (2011) - Norway (10), and Obsession (1943) - Italy (4)
The Host (2006) - South Korea (30) beat Another Round (2020) - Denmark (29), Hedgehog in the Fog (1975) - Russia (7), and Out 1 (1971) - France (7)
High and Low (1963) - Japan (33) beat The Hourglass Sanatorium (1973) - Poland (10), Pale Flower (1964) - Japan (5), and Any Number Can Win (1963) - France (2)
Pan’s Labyrinth (2006) - Mexico (85) beat Apocalypto (2006) - USA (42), Hiroshima Mon Amour (1959) - France (19), and The House is Black (1963) - Iran (5)
Parasite (2019) - South Korea (106) beat Holy Motors (2012) - France (16), The Human Condition I: No Greater Love (1959) - Japan (16), and Army of Crime (2009) - France (1)
Hour of the Wolf (1968) - Sweden (16) beat Army of Shadows (1969) - France (13), The Human Condition III: A Soldier’s Prayer (1961) - Japan (9), and Pastoral: To Die in the Country (1974) - Japan (3)
The Hunt (2012) - Denmark (42) beat I Saw the Devil (2010) - South Korea (25), Ashes and Diamonds (1958) - Poland (9), and Pater Brown – Das schwarze Schaf (1960) - Germany
Ikiru (1952) - Japan (34) beat The Killer (1989) - Hong Kong (25), Au Hasard Balthazar (1966) - France (10), and Pater Brown – Er kann's nicht lassen (1962) - Germany (4)
The Lives of Others (2006) - Germany (42) beat Au Revoir Les Enfants (1987) - France (27), Pauline at the Beach (1983) - France (11), and Il compagno Don Camillo (1965) - Italy (1)
Il Decameron (1971) - Italy (14) beat Pépé le Moko (1937) - France (13), The Man Without a Past (2002) - Finland (11), and Baahubali 2: The Conclusion 2017) - India (10)
Battle Royale (2000) - Japan (76) beat Persona (1966) - Sweden (36), The New Land (1972) - Sweden (7), and Il ritorno di Don Camillo (1953) - Italy (4)
Beauty and the Beast (1946) - France (19) beat Phoenix (2014) - Germany (14), The Platform (2019) - Spain (11), and In a Year with 13 Moons (1978) - Germany (5)
In the Mood for Love (2000) - Hong Kong (42) beat The Raid (2011) - Indonesia (30), Belle de Jour (1967) - France (16), and Pixote (1980) - Brazil (10)
The Red Balloon (1956) - France (23) beat Playtime (1967) - France (22), Inside (2007) - France (12), and Belle Époque (1992) - Spain (10)
Bicycle Thieves (1948) - Italy (39) beat The Rules of the Game (1939) - France (14), Intouchables (2011) - France (6), and Port of Shadows (1938) - France (2)
Ip Man (2008) - Hong Kong (37) beat The Saragossa Manuscript (1965) - Poland (11), Bienvenue chez les Ch'tis (2008) - France (6), and Pratidwandi (a.k.a. The Adversary) (1970) (India) (2)
Princess Mononoke (1997) - Japan (73) beat Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro (1983) - India (47), The Sacrifice (1986) - Sweden (17), and Black Girl (1966) - Senegal (13)
The Seventh Seal (1957) - Sweden (53) beat Blue Is the Warmest Color (2013) - France (18), Jauja (2014) - Argentina (6), and Pushpak (1987) - India (3)
Raise the Red Lantern (1991) - China (28) beat The Skin I Live In (2011) - Spain (23), Bob Le Flambeur (1956) - France (14), and Jean de Florette (1986) - France (6)
Ran (1985) - Japan (32) beat Breathless (1960) - France (14), Jeanne Dielman, 23, quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (1975) - Belgium (9), and The Tin Drum (1979) - Germany (2)
Johnny Gaddaar (2007) - India (45) beat Rare Exports - Finland (17), The Turin Horse (2011) - Hungary (15), and Cairo Station (1958) - Egypt (13)
Rashomon (1950) - Japan (37) beat Castle in the Sky (1986) - Japan (23), The Twilight Samurai (2002) - Japan (7), and Joyeux Noël (2005) - France (4)
Raw (2016) - France/Belgium (35) beat Jules and Jim (1962) - France (32), Celine and Julie Go Boating (1974) - France (19), and The Ugly Swans (2006) - Russia (3)
The Virgin Spring (1960) - Sweden (25) beat Red Beard (1965) - Japan (20), Katyn (2007) - Poland (4), and Cemetery of Splendour (2015) - Thailand (3)
Rififi (1955) -France (27) beat Kin-dza-dza (1986) - Russia (8), Children of Heaven (1997) - Iran (6), and The Warped Ones (1960) - Japan (3)
Chungking Express (1994) - Hong Kong (25) beat Three Colors: Blue (1993) - Poland/France (24), Roma (2018) - Mexico (18), and L’avventura (1960) - Italy (17)
Cinema Paradiso (1988) - Italy (23) beat Three Colors: Red (1994) - Poland/France (15), Rome, Open City (1945) - Italy (10), and La Belle Noiseuse (1991) - France (6)
City of God (2002) - Brazil (63) beat La Dolce Vita (1960) - Italy (31), Run Lola Run (1998) - Germany(27), and Three Times (2005) - Taiwan (5)
Throne of Blood (1957) - Japan (42) beat La Femme Nikita (1990) - France (25), Cold War (2018) - Poland (14), and Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam (1962) - India (5)
Come and See (1985) - Russia (50) beat La Haine (1995) - France (27), Through a Glass Darkly (1961) - Sweden (24), and Samurai Rebellion (1967) - Japan
La Jetee (1962) - France (26) beat Cries and Whispers (1972) - Sweden (19), Sansho the Bailiff (1954) - Japan (18), and Time Regained (1999) - France (3)
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000) - Taiwan (80) beat La Notte (1961) - Italy (21), Tokyo Godfathers (2003) - Japan (14), and Santa Sangre (1989) - Mexico (13)
Tokyo Story (1953) - Japan (31) beat Satantango (1994) - Hungary (11), La Vie de Bohème (1992) - Finland (5), and Daens (1992) - Belgium (1)
Das Boot (1981) - Germany (47) beat Lagaan: Once Upon a Time in India (2001) - India (7), Tokyo Tribe (2014) - Japan (5), and Satya (1998) - India (1)
Scenes from a Marriage (1974) - Sweden (21) beat Day of Wrath (1943) - Denmark (11), Lakshya (2004) - India (6), and Touchez Pas Au Grisbi (1954) - France (4)
Seven Samurai (1954) - Japan (90) beat Train to Busan (2016) - South Korea (51), Death Rides a Horse (1967) - Italy (4), and Landscape in the Mist (1988) - Greece (3)
Sholay (1975) - India (74) disqualified, Troll Hunter (2010) - Norway (36) beat Dekalog (1989) - Poland (33), and L'atalante (1934) - France (17)
Solaris (1972) - Russia (40) beat Delicatessen (1991) - France (22), Late Spring (1949) - Japan (13), and Ugetsu (1953) - Japan (12)
Umberto D. (1952) - Italy (16) beat Le Cercle Rouge (1970) - France (14), Soy Cuba (1964) - Russia (11), and Departures (2008) - Japan (8)
Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter…and Spring (2003) - South Korea (19) beat Victoria (2015) - Germany (9), Le Doulos (1962) - France (5), and Der Mann, der Sherlock Holmes war (1937) - Germany (4)
Stalker (1979) - Russia (43) beat Le Samourai (1967) - France (16), Der Untergang (2004) - Germany (6), and Viridiana (1961) - Spain/Mexico (5)
Wages Of Fear (1953) - France (19) beat Dersu Uzala (1975) - Russia (14), Le Trou (1960) - France (7), and Sunset (2018) - Hungary (5)
Werckmeister Harmonies (2001) - Hungary (11) beat Les Amants du Pont-Neuf (1991) - France (7), Survive Style 5+ (2004) - Japan (4), and Die Feuerzangenbowle (1944) - Germany (2)
Suspiria (1977) - Italy (36) beat Wild Strawberries (1957) - Sweden (19), Les Diaboliques (1955) - France (18), and Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie (1972) - France (17)
Winter Light (1963) - Sweden (22) beat Les Miserables (1995) - France (17), Syndromes and a Century (2006) - Thailand (7), and Do Bigha Zamin (1953) - India (5)
Life is Beautiful (1997) - Italy (35) beat Woman in the Dunes (1964) - Japan (27), Don Camillo e l’onorevole Peppone (1955) - Italy (1), and Tais Toi! (2003) - France (0)
Like Water For Chocolate (1992) - Mexico (16) beat Woyzeck (1979) - Germany (15), Take Care of My Cat (2001) - South Korea (7), and Don Camillo Monsignore…ma non troppo (1961) - Italy (4)
Y tu Mama Tambien (2001) - Mexico (39) beat Dr Mabuse The Gambler (1922) - Germany (16), Talk to Her (2002) - Spain (13), and Little World of Don Camillo (1952) - Italy (4)
Taste of Cherry (1997) - Iran (26) beat Lola Montès (1955) - France (7), Yeelen (Brightness) (1987) - Mali (4), and Dreizehn Stühle (1938) - Germany (2)
View Poll
submitted by Shagrrotten to IMDbFilmGeneral [link] [comments]


2023.03.30 09:50 Theis159 [OC] An statistical display of the Celtics statistics, why Mazzulla isn't the only to blame and some debunking of data

I'm writing this in light of the recent loss to the Wizards plus the fact that for some reason a lot of people in this sub got scared of us matching against the Heat in the first round, which is baffling specially given the reasoning (i.e: We haven't played well since the AS break). Since the break we have been a bit below 0.600 in winning percentage which is good for the 9th. You know the all-mighty and scary Heat? They're the 10th worst winning percentage since the break, at 0.444. I'll give you that Spoelstra is scary, he outplayed us last year after all. All I intend to do is to show a few data points I gathered so far during discussions recently here, I'd be willing to add anything that becomes more concerning if it is pointed to me.
So lets dive slightly on the (free-to-use) data for this season. Lets break it into a few segments shall we?
Segment of the season OffRtg DefRtg NetRtg AST% AST/TO AST Ratio OREB% DREB% REB% TOV% eFG% TS%
Whole season 4th 4th 1st 6th 5th 5th 27th 1st 10th 6th 4th 4th
From Nov 1st 4th 4th 1st 5th 3rd 5th 27th 1st 9th 7th 6th 7th
From Dec 1st 16th 2nd 4th 5th 8th 7th 26th 1st 7th 9th 13th 14th
From Jan 1st 10th 5th 4th 4th 7th 6th 25th 1st 7th 9th 8th 10th
From Feb 1st 8th 4th 3rd 8th 8th 7th 27th 1st 14th 11th 4th 7th
From March 1st 10th 2nd 2nd 10th 9th 10th 25th 6th 13th 9th 11th 13th
What does that mean? Well, we did play badly from March it seems like and in December. This also means that we've been consistently good. Yes we slipped in offense throughout the season but we've consistently been on the upper end of most of the offensive-related metrics available. It is also worth pointing that our half-court offense is pretty damn good ranking 3rd for the season.
How we did it though? My biggest point of why the Celtics didn't fill the shoes of the projected wins (yet, we can still finish above 55.5 wins) is health. Effectively, Mazzulla didn't have the same team as last year. This is not to say that Mazzulla is by any chance safe from criticisms, he just didn't have the same personnel. He did have an improvement of Brogdon and White (for the full season) compared to last year, but he didn't have the same Smart, Grant or Rob which we can all agree by eye test. But lets go to numbers a bit, specially for Rob and Smart.
Last year, Marcus played 2296 minutes, per Basketball Reference. This year, Smart played 1871 minutes so far. If he plays his average (32.3mpg) to finish the year, he will have a total of 2064 minutes played. Thats 232 minutes less, or 10.1% less minutes than last year. Given also he didn't play up to last year as well. This isn't worrisome I guess, since we had a bunch of minutes from White. I'd argue we didn't have our DPOY, so defense should (and did in absolute numbers) slip away.
Now, the biggest part Rob. Rob will be the majority of this but I'll include Al Horford for completeness. Last year Rob played 1804 minutes, Al played 2005 minutes. Total of 3809 minutes. We then had a bunch of Centers last year that go from: Enes Freedom, Daniel Theis, Luke Kornet, Bruno Fernando (only considering 50 minutes or more played). The total minutes we played the bench centers was 947.
This year we played just from Luke Kornet, 719 minutes. That's because Rob is set to play 1000 less minutes than last year. If we add Kornet, Blake, Vonleh we have 1383 minutes. This comes for an incredible thing, we have been a great defense for the year without a DPOY and a DPOY-candidate player playing as many minutes or even been themselves.
Does that mean that Rob and Smart are hurting the team? No, defense effectively improved with Rob back. But Smart is the one that has been highlighted a bit as a problem. For instance this data point, which seems to say White >>> Smart:
Now, the problem is the three man lineup of Smart, Brown and Tatum
But our four man lineups all have Smart, Jays, White, Al in any variation. Using 400 minutes as the cutoff 4 out of 15 best 4-man lineups. If we look only our team only it goes like this:
Why is this important though? We have 4 out of the 15 best. The Bucks appear in 16th for the first time.
Now, I do know a lot of people will point we had a better roster than last year. We got 2151 minutes of DWhite, 1622 of Brogdon, 1159 minutes of Hauser and 573 minutes of Payton. Which is a total of 5505 minutes. Compared to last year we got 1433 Minutes of Schroeder, 1087 of JRich, 1001 of Payton, 728 of Romeo, 713 of White, 158 Hauser and 112 of Jabari (lol), which is 5806 minutes. Yes, our team was better but it was different. It was smaller and had more shooting which directly translated into us taking 14% more threes this year. So what that means exactly? I'll be honest, not much. Its pretty hard to correlate the stats with winning. There is no formula for that.
But, more often than not top offenses and defenses for the season win championships. We did that. More often than not teams who reach 40 wins before 20 losses are "true" contenders. We did that. Does the last few games also correlate to winning it all? Not really. Lets check the last 30 games of the season from the recent champs and our recent 30 games stretch:
Does being the 1st seed in the NBA or in the EC translate in a winning it all? Not so much recently. The last 1st seed (nba-wise) to win it all was the 2017 Warriors. The last three EC 1st seed to win it all are 2016 Cavs, 2013 Heat and 2008 Celtics.
Does this analysis means anything but calming a bit the nerves? No, not really. A lot can happen until playoffs and during the playoffs. This was meant to look and say: yes, we had problems, we have problems, we will have problems. It doesn't mean we already lost the championship nor that we have already won. It means we got a shot, a pretty good one if we look into the past, whether all of it or even the most recent past.
To add (this is an edit) there were a lot of people who called out Mazzulla for not being confrontational like Ime was. Well, this is an extract of the interview Rob gave to Forsberg:
“Joe is confrontational, man. He helped us build that urge to be able to listen to one another. He addresses all elephants in the room as soon as he enters the room. We need that. You know what I’m saying? We need a coach that will lead like that. It’s easy to follow someone like that…Joe will snap. He will snap on you for sure,” Williams said.
TLDR: I showed a bit of the data I gathered through discussions here just to say that we have a decent shot at the championship, but we ain't perfect
submitted by Theis159 to bostonceltics [link] [comments]


2023.03.30 09:12 idli_vadaa How much do you think a good cleanser, toner, serum, moisturiser, sunscreen should cost per ml? && How much is your budget for each category?

I will go first.
I believe, a good CMS is all you need for a basic day.
**Cleanser**
- Simple hydrating facewash is my HG && my benchmark for per ml price. Its around Rs 275 or lower in sales for 150 ml which lasts me an entire year & more!! So, any cleanser I buy has to be performing like it in that price range. Presently using the Joy revive facewash which will cost like Rs 150/- for 150 ml
**Sunscreen**
- Since I got my hands on Skin aqua uv gel sunscreen which if bought in bulk from Amazon Japan comes at Rs 1300-1400 for 140 gm which give or take will be around 90-100 ml minimum, there is no looking back. For me, 700/- for 50ml is decent. Even Re'equil blue one costs more for 50g
See, gm and ml are not same. A 50g sunscreen will definitely be less than 50 ml as it's more in density
**Moisturiser**
- Now, that's tricky. Any good Japanese or Korean moisturiser is minimum, Rs 10/ml, for instance, isntree moisturisers, cosrx ones, meishoku ceracolla gel from Japan. But compared to pharmacy moisturisers like atomist lotion / cream, aquasoft FC, which come at around Rs 2-3 per ml, the K/J beauty ones are very costly. However, if we want something in particular like ceramides in golden ratio / panthenol / niacinamide, then K beauty may be a better choice, plus the formula matters for oily skinned people like me. Even cerave lotion is costly. Not less than Rs 1900-2000 for the 236 ml bottle
I am using the minimalist 5% niacinamide lotion for face which is very hydrating with 5% niacinamide
So, if you are depending on the moisturiser for taking the heavy weight in your routine, how much are you willing to pay per ml?
**Toner**
- not essential but I use them for fun. While K beauty ones are fun and hydrating, J beauty ones ordered from Amazon japan are really really good and cheap. For instance, the kikumasamune high moist lotion will be around Rs 1200 -1300 for 500 ml and the ingredients are bomb. Since it has arbutin, I won't use it for a prolonged time. Other than that, there is Cezanne high moist skin conditioner && even Gokujyun lotion(the white one) available at 400 ml. Also, there is Aoyama ceramide toner which comes at that price for whopping 1000 ml. A bottle will last entire year if used on face and body.
submitted by idli_vadaa to IndianSkincareAddicts [link] [comments]


2023.03.30 01:31 Fabulous-Procedure19 Fate Strange/Fake: Hassan of the Ghostly Weft

submitted by Fabulous-Procedure19 to grandorder [link] [comments]


2023.03.29 23:54 Anya1976 Lotions OTD

submitted by Anya1976 to tanning [link] [comments]


2023.03.29 20:22 TheAverageJoe93 Another iRacing iRating graph for everyone who cares.

Another iRacing iRating graph for everyone who cares. submitted by TheAverageJoe93 to iRacing [link] [comments]


2023.03.29 19:21 -mightymichael Methane SIBO - Antimicrobial Protocol Feedback

Methane-dominant here. My functional medicine doctor is recommending the following "eradication" protocol. I am sensitive to medications/supplements and am nervous about it. Based on the research I've done, I was expecting/hoping to just be prescribed simple single-ingredient supplements -- namely, Allicin, Oregano and Neem.
He instead insists on herbal "blends" as follows for four weeks (ingredients listed at the end of my post):
- Biocidin LSF Liposomal Formula Liquid
- CandiBactin-BR
- Paracid Forte
He also wants me to take PHGG (Partially Hydrolyzed Guar Gum fiber supplement) throughout, and continue taking Colostrum and Saccharomyces Boulardii which I have already been on for a month.
--- Does he have this right? Is the above a safe, standard protocol to address Methane-based SIBO? I want to trust him, but have my doubts that he knows enough about this.
--- Is there any benefit or risk to taking the herbal blends as opposed to a single/limited ingredient supplement? My instinct tells me to stick to simple ingredient supplements, but maybe I'm missing something.
--- Is there anything that should be added or taken away from this protocol that could make it easier to handle (IE add in some sort of detox support?)
Any feedback or advice on the above protocol would be much appreciated. I've copied the full ingredient list of each herbal blend below for reference in case anyone is unfamiliar. Honestly just looking at these lists makes my stomach hurt.
-----------------------------------------------------------
**Biocidin**
Proprietary Herbal Blend ... 50mg
Bilberry fruit extract, Grape seed extract, Shiitake mushroom extract, Golden Seal root, Noni fruit extract, Garlic bulb, White Willow bark, Milk Thistle seed, Raspberry fruit, Echinacea Purpurea plant extract, Echinacea Angustifolia root, Black Walnut hull, Black Walnut leaf, Lavender oil, Oregano oil, Galbanum oil, Tea Tree oil, Fumitory aerial parts extract, Gentian Lutea root Phospholipids (from Sunflower Seed lecithin)

**CandiBactin-BR**
Berberine hydrochloride ... 400 mg
Proprietary Extract ... 300 mg
Coptis (Coptis chinensis) Root & Rhizome, Chinese Skullcap (Scutellaria baicalensis) Root, Phellodendron (Phellodendron chinense) Bark, Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Rhizome, Chinese Licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis) Root, Chinese Rhubarb (Rheum officinale) Root & Rhizome
Oregon Grape Root 4:1 Extract ... 70 mg
(Berberis aquifolium)
Coptis Root & Rhizome 12:1 Extract ... 30 mg
(Coptis chinensis) (containing berberine)

**Paracid Forte**
Sweet Wormwood 150 mg
Olive Leaf Extract 100 mg
Black Walnut Hulls 85 mg
Berberine Hydrochloride Hydrate 75 mg
Artemisinin 25 mg
submitted by -mightymichael to SIBO [link] [comments]


2023.03.29 18:31 Atheist_Bishop The road to 17 million members

The church reached 4 million members in 1978 [1], just 7 years after recording 3 million members. A lot of things were changing during that time, and the trajectory of church growth was one of them. Starting that year, you could reliably count on the membership to break the next million-member mark (e.g. 5 million, 6 million, etc.) every ~3–4 years [2]. That trend continued all the way to the 16 million member mark in 2017.
Based on that recent trend, it was reasonable to expect membership to hit the 17 million mark at the latest in 2021. Of course there have been some mitigating circumstances in the past few years. But even pre-pandemic there were signs that something had changed. By 2013 the growth rate was dropping and hitting new historically low levels each year until small increase in 2019.
Year Growth Rate Notes
2013 2.03% Lowest rate since 1974
2014 1.92% Lowest rate since 1957
2015 1.70% Lowest rate since 1918
2016 1.59% Lowest rate since 1909
2017 1.48% Lowest rate since 1866
2018 1.21% Lowest rate since 1858
2019 1.54% First increase since 2012
2020 0.60% Limited in-person contact
2021 0.85% Partial in-person contact
In the coming week we should see a release of the latest statistical report of the church. And it seems like a 50/50 proposition on whether the reported membership will break 17 million. For reference, the 2021 membership was 16,805,400. The growth rate in 2022 would have to have been 1.16% to hit the next million-member milestone.
Is that growth rate good or bad? I think that depends on how it's contextualized. Pre-pandemic, such a growth rate would have been the lowest since 1858. But in this new era it would represent a breakout from the worldwide slowdown and a return to the previous trend.
To look at the data a bit further, I use Holt's linear trend to forecast membership growth. Using only the pre-pandemic data, the model shows a growth rate of 1.35% for 2022, which would put the membership at 17,031,457. When the 2020–2021 data is included, the growth rate is 0.87% which puts the 2022 membership at 16,951,200.
As you can see, it's not easy predicting if the church surpassed 17 million members in 2022. But either way, it appears that the days of adding a million members every ~3–4 years has come to an end. Looking at the model of the data up through 2019 indicates a new ~5–6 year period between millions for the near future. Including the 2020–2021 data extends that to a ~8–9 year period. The 2022 report should give us some idea which model is more predictive. My guess is it will be closer to ~5–6 years.
As for my prediction on 2022 membership, I'm going to say it does hit 17 million, but it's going to be close. Mark me down for 17,015,777.
Speaking of things that are very close, I looked at the data from 1978 to the present to see the closest it ever came to hitting the next million right on the nose.
Will 2022 have a smaller margin? It's definitely in the realm of possibility with either model, and would not surprise me. Though I guess that's obvious based on my prediction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Somebody put together a very comprehensive Google doc with church demographics sourced from the official annual statistical reports. I haven't been able to identify the author but I'm grateful for their work.
[1] I'm using the official membership data from the church and I'm taking it at face value for the purposes of the analysis.
[2] mean=3.25, sd=0.6, range=2–4
submitted by Atheist_Bishop to mormon [link] [comments]


2023.03.29 18:30 Atheist_Bishop The road to 17 million members

The church reached 4 million members in 1978 [1], just 7 years after recording 3 million members. A lot of things were changing during that time, and the trajectory of church growth was one of them. Starting that year, you could reliably count on the membership to break the next million-member mark (e.g. 5 million, 6 million, etc.) every ~3–4 years [2]. That trend continued all the way to the 16 million member mark in 2017.
Based on that recent trend, it was reasonable to expect membership to hit the 17 million mark at the latest in 2021. Of course there have been some mitigating circumstances in the past few years. But even pre-pandemic there were signs that something had changed. By 2013 the growth rate was dropping and hitting new historically low levels each year until small increase in 2019.
Year Growth Rate Notes
2013 2.03% Lowest rate since 1974
2014 1.92% Lowest rate since 1957
2015 1.70% Lowest rate since 1918
2016 1.59% Lowest rate since 1909
2017 1.48% Lowest rate since 1866
2018 1.21% Lowest rate since 1858
2019 1.54% First increase since 2012
2020 0.60% Limited in-person contact
2021 0.85% Partial in-person contact
In the coming week we should see a release of the latest statistical report of the church. And it seems like a 50/50 proposition on whether the reported membership will break 17 million. For reference, the 2021 membership was 16,805,400. The growth rate in 2022 would have to have been 1.16% to hit the next million-member milestone.
Is that growth rate good or bad? I think that depends on how it's contextualized. Pre-pandemic, such a growth rate would have been the lowest since 1858. But in this new era it would represent a breakout from the worldwide slowdown and a return to the previous trend.
To look at the data a bit further, I use Holt's linear trend to forecast membership growth. Using only the pre-pandemic data, the model shows a growth rate of 1.35% for 2022, which would put the membership at 17,031,457. When the 2020–2021 data is included, the growth rate is 0.87% which puts the 2022 membership at 16,951,200.
As you can see, it's not easy predicting if the church surpassed 17 million members in 2022. But either way, it appears that the days of adding a million members every ~3–4 years has come to an end. Looking at the model of the data up through 2019 indicates a new ~5–6 year period between millions for the near future. Including the 2020–2021 data extends that to a ~8–9 year period. The 2022 report should give us some idea which model is more predictive. My guess is it will be closer to ~5–6 years.
As for my prediction on 2022 membership, I'm going to say it does hit 17 million, but it's going to be close. Mark me down for 17,015,777.
Speaking of things that are very close, I looked at the data from 1978 to the present to see the closest it ever came to hitting the next million right on the nose.
Will 2022 have a smaller margin? It's definitely in the realm of possibility with either model, and would not surprise me. Though I guess that's obvious based on my prediction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Somebody put together a very comprehensive Google doc with church demographics sourced from the official annual statistical reports. I haven't been able to identify the author but I'm grateful for their work.
[1] I'm using the official membership data from the church and I'm taking it at face value for the purposes of the analysis.
[2] mean=3.25, sd=0.6, range=2–4
submitted by Atheist_Bishop to latterdaysaints [link] [comments]


2023.03.29 01:10 Davegardner0 Road Disc Wheels Upgrade - how does this build "kit" look?

Road Disc Wheels Upgrade - how does this build
I'm thinking of building some better wheels for a newly purchased Cannondale Synapse 3L. I don't think I want to spend for carbon wheels, but I feel like I can get a big upgrade over the generic stock wheels with some nicer aluminum wheels. The goal would be some middle-ground between performance and durability.
The bike will be ridden on roads only, I don't envision any gravel or offroad riding. ~170lbs max rider+bike weight. I'm thinking Rene Herse 32mm tires. Do these parts and this spoke count seem appropriate?
  • Pacenti Forza Disc rims
  • Bitex BX106F/R hubs
  • Pillar spokes: TB2016 for front non-disc side and rear non-drive side, TB2017 for front disc side, TB2018 for rear drive side
  • Brass nipples
  • 28h front and rear

For reference, here are the stock wheels:
https://preview.redd.it/qwvxeg72akqa1.png?width=904&format=png&auto=webp&s=ea9c613127d87b99c3e6a703dde5cc8828cb9cfc
submitted by Davegardner0 to wheelbuild [link] [comments]


2023.03.29 00:15 skyelaw Asking AI about COL and after-tax remaining income

I've been toying with AI for the past few weeks and asked it how cost of living differences (assuming a single with no dependents) between some big and small legal markets impact the after-tax remaining proceeds. I've copied and pasted the results below.
The markets were NY, Chicago, Washington DC, Atlanta and Denver. I'm familiar with NY and it seems roughly right but curious if it is roughly right for the other markets as well - if you're familiar with any of them, let me know what you think!
I started my career in NYC and feel there were lots of non-financial (food, culture, nightlife) and financial (wealth of inhouse opps) benefits to working and living in the city, but the 50K difference in after-tax proceeds in the bank account would have been worthy of some consideration.
----------AI response------------
To provide you with a detailed comparison of the cost of living expenses in New York, Chicago, Washington DC, Atlanta, and Denver, I'll break down the main categories: housing, transportation, utilities, groceries, and healthcare. Please note that these are approximate values, and actual costs may vary depending on your lifestyle choices and specific neighborhood.
  1. Housing (rent for a 1-bedroom apartment in a mid-range area):
  1. Transportation (public transportation and/or car ownership):
  1. Utilities (electricity, heating, cooling, water, garbage for an 85m2 apartment):
  1. Groceries:
  1. Healthcare (insurance premium and out-of-pocket expenses):
Now let's calculate your approximate monthly take-home pay after federal, state, and city income taxes. Assuming you are single with no dependents, your salary is $215,000, and you have $100,000 in student loan debt, your tax rates are as follows:
To calculate your take-home pay, we can use the following formula:
Take-home pay = Gross salary - (Gross salary * Federal tax rate) - (Gross salary * State tax rate) - (Gross salary * City tax rate)
After calculating the take-home pay for each city, we'll subtract the major cost of living expenses to determine the remaining income:
  1. New York:
  1. Chicago:
  1. Washington DC:
  1. Atlanta:
  1. Denver:
submitted by skyelaw to biglaw [link] [comments]


2023.03.29 00:00 ImaginaryDrawingsTwt An influent Brazilian economist became a heterodox economist influenced by David Graeber and alike and he is now delivering wrong economic history lectures to universities and writing this erros in books

André Lara Resende is one of the “fathers” of the very successful Plano Real, it successfully turned the hyperinflationary Brazilian economy in a stable one very quickly in the 90s (he was also one of the “fathers” of other failed plans, but still…).
Not much time ago, he became a heterodox economist, saying things like “economic orthodoxy is a failed ideology”. But I won’t talk about it, I will talk about his takes on the English Monetary History, and how it is completely wrong.
Why is it important? The current Lula's government has an economic team divided into two main sectors. One sector argues that the fiscal regime must have real limits and these limits must be respected. The other sector believes that the expansionary fiscal policy can be unlimited. The former is led by the former Minister of Education and current Minister of Economy, Fernando Haddad. The latter is led by the former Minister of Education and current President of the Brazilian Bank of Development, Aloizio Mercadante. Mercadante's intellectual guru is André Lara Resende, the main proponent of the unlimited expansionary fiscal regime.
In a lecture to the Institute of Economics of Unicamp, the second most important Brazilian university (behind USP only), André Lara Resende uses the English monetary history to substantiate his theory about the non-spontaneity of the currencies, seen first in his book Consenso e Contrassenso (Consensus and “Nonsense”, 2020):
Lecture to UNICAMP on YouTube, in Portuguese but with auto-generated English subtitles.
What is talked about in this class is basically what is talked about in his book:
Chapter 1: Currency, ideas, and politics
Currency as a public service
Roman coins circulated in England, as well as throughout the Roman Empire, until the end of the 6th century. With the withdrawal of the Romans, Britain's administrative and military structure was dismantled, and the English economy was demonetized. From the beginning of the 5th century to the end of the 7th century there was virtually no currency in circulation in England (Source: Robert Barro: Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?, Journal of Political Economy, n. 81, v. 6, 1974). Most Roman coins fell out of circulation. Worn out or hoarded, the remnants continued to circulate sparsely, and markets collapsed. The impact of monetary liquidity on material conditions and cultural production was dramatic. If we believe in currency as a creation of market needs, these would be the ideal conditions for the emergence of a local currency, but that is not what happened. Without a central authority capable of establishing the unit of account for recording transactions, trade declined, all demand disappeared, and there is no evidence of merchant activities until the end of the 7th century. According to Chris Wickham, “all forms of exchange, beyond the most rudimentary, must have ceased” (Source: David Graeber, Debt: The First 5000 Years. London: Melville House, 2011).
According to archaeological studies, reorganization in the Anglo-Saxon lands began at the end of the 6th century. At the beginning of the 8th century, with the reconstruction of political power and the consolidation of hierarchically more organized small kingdoms, units of account for pecuniary obligations were reintroduced, and trade flourished again. From the 11th century onwards, currency began to be regulated and institutionalized both in England and on the European continent. Governments then realized that they needed to introduce a more efficient means of collecting taxes and transferring resources. The oldest extant report from the English Treasury, from the late 12th century, states:
Currency is needed, not only in times of war, but also in times of peace. Because, in the first case, the revenues are spent on fortifying cities, paying soldiers’ salaries. When hostilities cease, weapons of war are laid aside, churches are built by pious princes, Christ is clothed and fed in the person of the poor, and the mammon of this world is distributed through other acts of charity (source: Edmund Phelps , “The Golden Rule of Accumulation: A Fable of Growthmen”, American Economic Review, v. 51, n. 4, 1961).
Despite the interest of the central power in the institution of money, for many years governments charged for its coinage. Having established the silver or gold content of each coin, anyone could take the metal to an authorized house and, subject to a discount on the contributed metal, leave with the officially minted legal tender coins. The discount, known as seigniorage, was supposed to cover the cost of the coinage and remunerate the government for the service rendered. Until today, when the currency is exclusively fiduciary, the government's gain with its issuance, on which no interest is levied, is called seigniorage. The public was willing to pay the seigniorage, the cost of minting plus a tribute, which could reach up to 5% of the metallic value minted, because the homogenization and regulation of currency was a highly valued service. The chronic illiquidity of the medieval European economy meant that coins almost always circulated at a premium over metallic value. When that premium was far above the cost of seigniorage, more metal was taken to be minted. After the sixteenth century, when the lack of liquidity had already been mitigated, in the rare moments when the rise in silver and gold prices made the coin's face value less than its metallic value, the pieces were melted down, thus creating a endogenous mechanism of expansion and contraction of the stock of physical money.
Medieval metallic coins were always subject to the problem of loss of metallic content, whether due to dishonest scraping or wear and tear of its use, which forced the authorities to remove them from circulation and replace them with new ones, in accordance with established norms for legal tender. The costs of currency renewal fell mostly on the holders of old coins. The premium on its metallic content, the cost of minting, as well as those of currency reforms, all borne for the most part by the public, is evidence of the high value of the service provided by the coin. The universal acceptance guaranteed by legal tender, by the fact of being accepted to settle tax debts and all kinds of official charges, is a public service for which society has always been willing to pay. The reference value and liquidity of the currency is vital for the functioning and expansion of markets. Rulers could charge for currency, which benefited both the government and the public, because illiquidity has always been a painful constraint on trade and all economic activity.
So, I would like to highlight his main points about the history of currency in England, so that we can see how, in fact, the English monetary history was.

Main Points

  1. Video: “Up to the 7th century, in England, circulated the metallic Roman coins”;
Book: “Roman coins circulated in England, as well as throughout the Roman Empire, until the end of the 6th century”.
  1. The coins ceased to circulate.
  2. Video: there was a complete collapse of economic activity in England;
Book: markets collapsed.
Implicitly, 4. Markets collapsed because of lack of currency.
  1. Video: the ideal situation for an economy that had already been a monetary economy to recreate a spontaneous currency;
Book: If we believe in currency as a creation of market needs, these would be the ideal conditions for the emergence of a local currency.
  1. Video: and none of that happened;
Book: but that is not what happened.
  1. Video: It was only from the 11th century onwards that there was a certain amount of centralization, it was during this period that money began to reappear, therefore, the crown started with the idea of creating an accounting system to collect taxes.
Book: From the 11th century onwards, currency began to be regulated and institutionalized both in England and on the European continent. Governments then realized that they needed to introduce a more efficient means of collecting taxes and transferring resources.

The first coins minted in England: coin in the British Iron Age

Although Lara Resende says that “it was from the 11th century that metallic coins began to be minted in England for the first time” (video), the first metallic coins minted in England actually date from pre-Roman times.
For better situational understanding, here is a modern map of the tribes that inhabited the British Isles before the Romans:
Image 1. Pre-Roman British islands
The Southern Britain, the region conquered by Rome, had several tribes and several of these tribes already had a monetary system. Take a look at some of the coins sold by the traditional Baldwin’s numismatic shop:
Image 2. Corieltauvi
Image 3. Iceni
Image 4. Trinovantes and Catuvellauni, it is presumed that, at some point, a tribe was suzerain of another tribe, causing a common coin to be produced in both tribes
Image 5. Belgae
Image 6. Dobunni
Image 7. Durotriges
Coins named “stater” were inspired by the Greek coins of the same name. Therefore, it can be said with a high degree of certainty that this region of southern Britain had a monetary system in pre-Roman times:
Image 8. Area of pre-Roman Britain with a monetary system
Damnonii
Image 9. Damnonii
A curious case, however, are the Dumnonii (Damnonii, depending on the author). Gaius Julius Solinus (c. 3rd century CE) points out in his book Polyhistor (c. 3rd century CE) that they lived in the ancient way, without the use of money, but on the basis of giving and accept and by exchange – which is a possible reference to a mutual gift and barter economy, one should not exclude the other.
§ 22.7 {9} This turbid strait also divides the island Silura from the shore which is held by the Dumnonii, a British tribe. The men of this island even now preserve an old custom: they do not use coins. They give and accept, obtaining the necessities of life by exchange rather than by money. They reverence gods, and the men and women equally declare knowledge of the future.
--------
Siluram quoque insulam ab ora quam gens Brittana Dumnonii tenent turbidum fretum distinguit. Cuius homines etiamnunc custodiunt morem uetustum: nummum refutant; dant res et accipiunt; mutationibus necessaria potius quam pretiis parant; deos percolunt; scientiam futurorum pariter uiri ac feminae ostentant

The economic decline of the 5th and 6th centuries

Was the British economic collapse of the 5th and 6th century caused by the absence of coins, or was the absence of coins caused by economic collapse?
Four points:
  1. Institutional crisis and the Anglo-Saxons;
  2. Bubonic plague;
  3. Natural disaster;
  4. Population decline.

1. Institutional crisis and the Anglo-Saxons

Given the extensive body of research on institutions and their role in promoting national prosperity, as well as the overwhelming support for this idea among leading economists such as Acemoglu, Coase, Ostrom, Williamson, and others, I believe that stressing the importance of institutions to a nation's success would be redundant.
However, it is important to note that after the abrupt departure of the Romans from British lands, the island experienced a profound institutional crisis. Moreover, Britannia began to receive people from different regions.
One of André Lara Resende's points is: as Britain was used to have a monetary system, it was natural that the same people — the Britons — would continue having a monetary system, which did not happen. First of all, it is important to note that the population of Anglo-Saxon England differed significantly from that of Roman Britain, with the arrival of the Angles and Saxons from the continent following the abrupt Roman departure, when the defenses were weakened. As a side note, the emergence of the King Arthur myth, wherein he, a Briton, defends Britannia against the Anglo-Saxons, can be traced back to this time in history.
Image 10. The new inhabitants of Great Britain

2. Bubonic plague, c. 525 —

Although not as well-known as the Black Death, the bubonic plague known as the Justinian Plague had a profound impact on Europe that lasted for centuries.
Image 11. Introductory article on the history of epidemics

3. Natural disaster: the volcanic winter of 536

In addition to the bubonic pandemic, the massive eruption of a volcano, likely located in Iceland, had far-reaching consequences. This event resulted in a significant cooling of the Northern Hemisphere, known as Late Antique Little Ice Age.
Image 12. Change in average global temperature
One of the most compelling documented of evidence — in addition to scientific analysis of volcanic activity — is the widespread reports of crop failures during this period, which likely contributed to a devastating famine across Europe.
The convergence of pandemic and natural disaster was so significant that many historians regard the 6th century AD as one of the most difficult times to be alive.
Image 13. Science: Why 536 was the 'the worst year to be alive'

4. European population decline

The impact of the combination of these disasters was so profound that it not only affected England, as noted by André Lara Resende, but also brought Europe as a whole to an economic collapse. The evidence of the continent-wide disaster is manifold, with one of the most striking being the precipitous decline in population, which was, at that time, closely linked to social breakdowns.
Image 14. European population decline in both bubonic plagues
Considering the array of factors that contributed to the economic collapse of England in the 5th and 6th centuries, it appears highly unlikely that the absence of local coinage played a decisive role. Rather, the delay in the appearance of local coinage can be more reasonably attributed to the general economic collapse that characterized both Britain and continental Europe during this era. It should be noted that the assertion put forward by Lara Resende on video that England only began to mint its own coinage in the 11th century is mistaken, as there is ample evidence of local coin production dating back to the 7th century.

Thrymsas and sceattas, the resurgence of British coins in the 7th century

Thrysmsas

In the early 7th century, the introduction of thrymsas marked the first instance of coin minting in England after the Roman era. These coins were modeled after the Roman tremissis, which is precisely what would happen if the theory of the spontaneity of coins were not false, according to André Lara Resende’s train of thought.
Image 15. Thrymsas

Sceattas (early pennies)

The sceattas, called by some scholars as “early pennies”, were the first silver coins minted in Anglo-Saxon England. In the 7th century, they completely replaced the production of gold coins (thrymsas). They were minted by several individuals and the extent of royal control over their production remains a topic of debate.
Some sceattas, for example, were produced by the Church and it is not clear what kind of control the kings of the small Anglo-Saxon kingdoms of the time exercised over the “Coins of the Saints”, or even if there was any control at all.
On this subject, Professor Rory Naismith, a specialist in Early Medieval English monetary history, concludes:
Image 16. Money of the Saints
However, it is important to note that ecclesiastical coins only represented a fraction of the sceattas. In fact, there are several other examples of these coins dating back to at least the 7th century, long before the 11th century as previously suggested.
Image 17. Sceattas
While some sceattas feature the portrait of a king and his name, others bear only the name of the moneyer and a symbol, others display the name of the moneyer and the mint. The diversity of these coins was so great that it is unlikely that rigid centralized control existed during this period. The sceattas exhibit a remarkable variety of designs and inscriptions, which suggests that the production of these coins was largely decentralized and subject to the discretion of individual minters and merchants.

Penny

The lack of knowledge regarding thrymsas and sceattas is understandable, as their discoveries have been more recent (it has increased with the technological advancement of archeology) and their popularity is relatively low. However, it is surprising to ignore the penny, a currency that played a significant role in English history, and to claim that the first coin was only minted in England in the 11th century.
In effect, the penny was formalized as the currency of Mercia, an Anglo-Saxon kingdom, by the end of the 8th century through the reforms of King Offa, who centralized coin production and exercised stricter control over it.
It is worth noting that the reputable auction house Baldwin’s has sold several Anglo-Saxon pennies, dating back to before the 11th century, further emphasizing the long-standing presence of coinage in England.
Image 18. Pennies

Conclusion

The account of English currency history presented by André Lara Resende, one the greatest Brazilian economists, in his book Consenso e Contrassenso (2020) and his video lecture for the Institute of Economics of Unicamp (2021), contains several significant flaws that require reassessment. These flaws lead to erroneous conclusions and undermine the credibility of his work.
Therefore, the conclusions of the main points are:
Premise 1: “Up to the 7th century, in England, circulated the metallic Roman coins”, Premise 2: The coins ceased to circulate.
Correct. Following the disappearance of Roman coins from Anglo-Saxon England, imitations of Roman coins began to be produced (thrymsas).
Premise 3. “there was a complete collapse of economic activity in England”.
Correct. Not only in England, but all over Europe. The abrupt departure of the Romans from Britannia in the early 5th century and the subsequent invasion of the Angles and Saxons, who did not have a monetary economy, led to an institutional, social, and economic crisis in England. Additionally, the pandemic and volcanic winter of the 6th century caused a significant economic stagnation throughout Europe.
Conclusion 4. Markets collapsed because of lack of currency.
Unlikely. The collapse of markets and the rise of subsistence economies are better explained by the abrupt Roman exit, the Anglo-Saxon invasion, the Justinian Plague, and the Late Antique Little Ice Age.
Premise 5. If we believe in currency as a creation of market needs, these would be the ideal conditions for the emergence of a local currency.
Correct, the absence of currency creates the need for currency.
Conclusion 6. but that is not what happened.
Incorrect, several coins emerged in Anglo-Saxon England, contradicting the claim that there was a complete absence of currency during this period.
Conclusion 7. It was only from the 11th century onwards that there was a certain amount of centralization, it was during this period that money began to reappear, therefore, the crown started with the idea of creating an accounting system to collect taxes.
Incorrect. Thus, the idea that there was no local currency during Anglo-Saxon England, from the end of Roman Britain to the Norman Conquest in the 11th century, as basically purported by André Lara Resende, is factually incorrect.

References

Alessia Rovelli, Money and Coinage in the Middle Ages (Boston: Brill, 2018)
André Lara Resende, Consenso e Contrassenso: Por uma Economia Não Dogmática (Portfolio Penguin, 2020).


Anna Gannon, The Iconography of Early Anglo-Saxon Coinage: Sixth to Eighth Centuries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)

Carlo M. Cipolla, The Fontana Economic History of Europe Volume I: The Middle Ages (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1972)

Kathryn A. Glatter e Paul Finkelman, History of the Plague: An Ancient Pandemic for the Age of COVID-19, Am J Med, 2021, Volume 134 (2): p. 176–181.
Rory Naismith, Medieval European Coinage 8: Britain and Ireland c. 400–1066 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)
Rory Naismith, Studies in Early Medieval Coinage 3: Sifting the Evidence (Spike Books, 2014)
submitted by ImaginaryDrawingsTwt to badeconomics [link] [comments]


2023.03.28 23:40 lsp1018 In case anyone who read the now locked and deleted post about gun violence is curious

So...
In Kalamazoo City, there have been 43 reported assaults with a firearm in 2023. This is a 44% increase in reports from the past 10 years, however, it also shows a 25% decrease over the last year - so far in these first few months. In the last seven days, there were 2 reports of gun violence in Kalamazoo. This does not cover the entire county. (Kalamazoopublicsafety.org)
Portage's 2021 annual report listed 130 murdenon-negligent homicides, weapons offenses, and aggravated/felonious assaults (I excluded all other crime statistics data even if it could potentially be relevant as the use of a firearm is not further clarified in the Portage report). They do not provide a link to previous reports. (portagemi.gov)
The most recent Michigan annual report from 2021 does not list detailed incidents for Kalamazoo county, but by the state, but does appear reliable if you're interested in checking that out: (Michigan.gov)
The firearms injury death rate in Michigan in 2020 is 14.6 (per 100,000) according to the CDC. Compared to 2017 when the rate was 11.3. (CDC.gov)
(https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/02/03/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/) :
'Nearly eight-in-ten (79%) U.S. murders in 2020 – 19,384 out of 24,576 – involved a firearm. In 2020, 54% of all gun-related deaths in the U.S. were suicides (24,292), while 43% were murders (19,384), according to the CDC. The remaining gun deaths that year were unintentional (535), involved law enforcement (611) or had undetermined circumstances (400).
In 2020, the U. S. saw the highest per capita gun death rate in years at 13.6, but this is still below the peak of 16.3 gun deaths per 100,000 people in 1974 per capita nationwide. The Gun Violence Archive, an online database of gun violence incidents in the U.S., defines mass shootings as incidents in which four or more people are shot, even if no one was killed (again excluding the shooters). Using this definition, 513 people died in these incidents in 2020. In 2020, handguns were involved in 59% of the 13,620 U.S. gun murders and non-negligent manslaughters for which data is available, according to the FBI. Rifles – the category that includes guns sometimes referred to as “assault weapons” – were involved in 3% of firearm murders. Shotguns were involved in 1%. The remainder of gun homicides and non-negligent manslaughters (36%) involved other kinds of firearms or those classified as “type not stated.”
It’s important to note that the FBI’s statistics do not capture the details on all gun murders in the U.S. each year. The FBI’s data is based on information voluntarily submitted by police departments around the country, and not all agencies participate or provide complete information each year.'
This is purely to provide data and a space for discussion, if so inclined, as the other thread was locked and then deleted. I thought it might be prudent to follow up with the topic of original poster's topic with reputable sources that include as up-to-date data as I could locate.
submitted by lsp1018 to kzoo [link] [comments]


2023.03.28 23:01 NKTVRN Graffiti writer looking for a cheap, compact chest bag to EDC the following.

Graffiti writer looking for a cheap, compact chest bag to EDC the following. submitted by NKTVRN to backpacks [link] [comments]


2023.03.28 22:13 TheMaltesefalco Pro Payouts and Data

Pro Payouts and Data
I was catching up on some podcast episodes and heard Brodie on Tour Life mention several times about the payouts. First he said they didnt grow. Then he acknowledged they have grown some but not enough to his liking. I thought i’d crunch some data to really find out whats up. Turns out to definitely not the long term Pro’s surprise that over the past 5-6 years almost all high level DGPT events have doubled the purse. I’m not smart enough to create a line graph but the data is easy to read.
submitted by TheMaltesefalco to discgolf [link] [comments]


2023.03.28 20:09 Then_Marionberry_259 MAR 28, 2023 AAG.V AFTERMATH PROVIDES BERENGUELA PROJECT UPDATE

MAR 28, 2023 AAG.V AFTERMATH PROVIDES BERENGUELA PROJECT UPDATE
https://preview.redd.it/ec7bj1r7tiqa1.png?width=3500&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb96057a659a8fdcb44ab8faef76d4ebef26eaa1
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - March 28, 2023) - Aftermath Silver Ltd. (TSXV: AAG) (OTCQX: AAGFF) (the "Company" or "Aftermath Silver") is pleased to provide an update on the Berenguela silver-copper-manganese project in southern Peru.
On March 2nd, 2023 the Company published an updated and expanded mineral resource for the property (see AAG News release dated March 1, 2023). Drilling in 2021-2 was in part designed to obtain bulk (PQ diameter) core samples from various geological and metallurgical domains at Berenguela. A comprehensive bench-test beneficiation program on selected composite core samples is being designed by Kappes Cassidy of Reno, Nevada, USA, focusing on optimising processing and recoveries of silver, manganese, copper, and zinc, and on potential manganese products including agricultural and battery grade manganese sulphate (MnSO4).The Company currently anticipates completion of the program in Q3/Q4 of 2023. The results will provide key technical inputs for Aftermath's planned Preliminary Economic Analysis which is expected to begin in late 2023.
Composite core samples, representing the key mineralized domains, are now being assembled at the Company's core storage facility in Arequipa. They will be shipped to KCA's facility in Reno to facilitate pre-treatment beneficiation testing which will include ore-sorting. As a first step, initial visual evaluations are being carried out on core samples from current and historic drilling focusing on the distribution of various minerals and their relationship with assay grades.
Fieldwork is expected to recommence in June with exploration and mapping east of the known mineralisation on potential extensions indicated by outcrops, historic drilling and existing underground workings. The work will also investigate a potential intrusive centre to the east of the main Berenguela mineralization.
Bereguela Mineral Resource
The Mineral Resource at Berenguela, reported in accordance with National Instrument 43‐101 ("NI 43‐101") and completed by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. ("AMC") contains 101.2 Moz Ag + 589 Mlbs CU+ 2.45Mt Mn in Measured and Indicated Resources and 38.8 Moz Ag + 204 Mlbs Cu + 0.8Mt Mn in Inferred Resources detailed in the table below and in Aftermaths news release dated March 2nd, 2023 (linked here https://tinyurl.com/mrxhckk3).
Table 1. Berenguela Ag-Cu-Mn deposit Mineral Resource as of 31 January 2023
https://preview.redd.it/z6wz4qt7tiqa1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=0bbd1d7af88cf79aeabd2d8b360f4d98e55c9c56
Notes:
  • CIM Definition Standards (2014) were used for reporting the Mineral Resources.
  • The effective date of the estimate is 31 January 2023.
  • The Qualified Person is Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo., of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.
  • Mineral Resources are constrained by an optimized pit shell using the assumptions in Table 2.
  • No dilution or mining recovery applied.
  • Silver equivalency (AgEq) formula is AgEq = Ag+ Cu%\121.905+Mn%*22.809+Zn%*41.463 based on the parameters in Table 2.*
  • Cut-off grade is 80g/t AgEq.
  • Bulk density used was estimated and variable. but averaged 2.30 tonnes/m\*3* for mineralized material and 2.25 tonnes/m\*3* for waste.
  • Drilling results up to 13 October 2022.
  • Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
  • The numbers may not compute exactly due to rounding.
  • Mineral Resources are depleted for historic mined out material.
  • The relative value in the Mineral Resource by metal is as follows, Ag=26% Cu=26%, Mn=44%, Zn=4%.
Source: AMC, (2023)
The assumptions for the open pit optimization exercise to constrain the Mineral Resource and confirm reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Assumptions for pit optimization
https://preview.redd.it/o4yy1su7tiqa1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=aec99a230288dd8bd7ae08a14760ceba58aff102
Source: AMC, (2023).
Geology
Mineralization at Berenguela is hosted principally in thickly bedded, folded limestones and dolomitized limestones of mid-Cretaceous age. Several large bodies of black massive, patchy, and fracture-controlled manganese oxide replacement mineralization occur, with associated silver, copper, and zinc enrichment. Mineralisation is stratigraphically localised above a regional detachment zone particularly where footwall horsts coincide with more intense folding of the carbonate hosts.
The bulk of the mineralisation is typically preserved as eroded synform remnants, usually exposed at surface and trending 105-120 degrees. Mapping and resource modelling shows the mineralisation to extend for roughly 1,300 m along strike (including a 100 m discontinuity) with a width of 200 to 400 m. Drilling has shown the mineralisation to extend to up to 80 m below surface where preserved.
Berenguela is interpreted as a carbonate replacement deposit (CRD) of an unusual hypogene Mn-oxide style localised above a regional detachment zone in a low temperature, oxidising setting.
Qualified Person
Michael Parker, a Fellow of the AusIMM and a non-independent director of Aftermath, is a non-independent qualified person, as defined by NI 43-101. Mr. Parker has reviewed the technical content of this news release and consents to the information provided in the form and context in which it appears.
About Aftermath Silver Ltd.
Aftermath Silver Ltd. is a leading Canadian junior exploration company focused on silver, and aims to deliver shareholder value through the discovery, acquisition and development of quality silver projects in stable jurisdictions. Aftermath has developed a pipeline of projects at various stages of advancement. The Company's projects have been selected based on growth and development potential.
  • Berenguela Silver-Copper project. The Company has an option to acquire a 100% interest through a binding agreement with SSR Mining. The project is located in the Department of Puno, in southern central Peru. A NI 43-101 Technical Report on the property was filed in February 2021 (available on SEDAR and the Company's web page). The Company is currently drilling at Berenguela and planning to advance the project through a pre-feasibility study.
  • Challacollo Silver-Gold project. The Company recently completed the acquisition of a 100% interest in the Challacollo silver-gold project from Mandalay Resources; see Company news release dated August 11, 2022. A NI 43-101 mineral resource was released on December 15, 2020 (available on SEDAR and the Company's web page). The Company is currently permitting road access in anticipation of an upcoming drill program.
  • Cachinal Silver-Gold project. The Company owns a 100% interest in the Cachinal Ag-Au project, located 2.5 hours south of Antofagasta. On February 15, 2023, Aftermath announced it had signed a Share Purchase Agreement an agreement to sell Cachinal to Honey Badger Silver Inc. On September 16, 2020, the Company released a CIM compliant Mineral Resource and accompanying NI 43-101 Technical Report (available on SEDAR and on the Company's web page).
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
"Ralph Rushton"
Ralph Rushton CEO and Director 604-484-7855
The TSX Venture Exchange does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Certain of the statements and information in this news release constitute "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian provincial securities laws. Any statements or information that express or involve discussions with respect to interpretation of exploration programs and drill results, predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as "expects", "is expected", "anticipates", "believes", "plans", "projects", "estimates", "assumes", "intends", "strategies", "targets", "goals", "forecasts", "objectives", "budgets", "schedules", "potential" or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements or information.
These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward‐looking statements. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward‐looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward‐looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward‐looking statements include, but are not limited to, changes in commodities prices; changes in expected mineral production performance; unexpected increases in capital costs; exploitation and exploration results; continued availability of capital and financing; differing results and recommendations in the Feasibility Study; and general economic, market or business conditions. In addition, forward‐looking statements are subject to various risks, including but not limited to operational risk; political risk; currency risk; capital cost inflation risk; that data is incomplete or inaccurate. The reader is referred to the Company's filings with the Canadian securities regulators for disclosure regarding these and other risk factors, accessible through Aftermath Silver's profile at [www.sedar.com*](https://api.newsfilecorp.com/redirect/1z4jwFLxRM).*
There is no certainty that any forward‐looking statement will come to pass and investors should not place undue reliance upon forward‐looking statements. The Company does not undertake to provide updates to any of the forward‐looking statements in this release, except as required by law.
Cautionary Note to US Investors - Mineral Resources
This News Release has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (''NI 43-101'') and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Definition Standards, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. Canadian public disclosure standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), and information concerning mineralization, deposits, mineral reserve and resource information contained or referred to herein may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/160007

https://preview.redd.it/e1ajsjv7tiqa1.png?width=4000&format=png&auto=webp&s=7bb8ac2e5069a5e98611254e7aa684db8383e7bf
Universal Site Links
AFTERMATH SILVER LTD
STOCK METAL DATABASE
ADD TICKER TO THE DATABASE
www.reddit.com/Treaty_Creek
REPORT AN ERROR
submitted by Then_Marionberry_259 to Treaty_Creek [link] [comments]


2023.03.28 16:16 SimplyBartz05 "Eversoul" Q2 2023 Roadmap

A new roadmap video for Eversoul just came out earlier and it is filled with new upcoming hefty contents to the game, which is why I'm posting it here. If you don't want to read, you can just watch the EN version for yourself here or just look at the attached images. Now, without further ado:
Content calendar.
-- 100 Day Anniversary Free Summon Event --
-- Upcoming New Souls --
Release calendar.
Note: New Soul banners will now last for 3 weeks instead of 2.
11:13-12:16 - Preview.
-- Other Content --
Battlefront 19 will be released at some point in April. From this point on, players will be required to use 3 parties against Elite stages (every 5 stages) and Boss stages (end of Battlefront).
Changes to Champs Arena will be applied at some point in May. The March 13 Dev Notes discuss the changes coming to said PvP mode.
Tower of Origin and Battlefront Hard Mode will be released at some point in May. Tower of Origin is discussed below, while no details were revealed about Battlefront Hard Mode.
Main Story Chapter 5 will be released at some point in June. It was delayed as a result of disappoinment players had towards the writing decisions in Chapter 4, forcing Nine Ark to go back to the drawing board and rewrite what they had for Chapter 5, as discussed in the February 28 Dev Notes.
-- Angel/Demon Pick-up Banners --
Details.
With the upcoming Lizelotte banner on April 6, the first Angel/Demon Pick-up Banner will be released, which will work differently from regular Pick-up Banners.
-- Erika's Alchemy Summons --
Details.
-- EVENTS --
Event Schedule.
-- April 6 - 27: Everschool (School event) --
Summary.
Limited-time schoolgirl skins for Mephi, Linzy, and Claire.
Event Stages summary.
Event shop details.
Boss Raid: G. Mephi.
Event gachapon.
-- May 4 - 25: Merry Happy Marry (Wedding event) --
Preview of said event, feat. Cherrie, Nini, Violette, and Garnet.
Limited-time bride skins for Cherrie and Nini.
End of May: Evil Soul Subjugation - Doomsday Doll
June: Undisclosed summer event (Part 1)
Early June: Waves in Forest of Monsters (Mini-event)
Mid-June: Evil Soul Subjugation - The Witch Who Brought The End Of The World
UPCOMING CONTENTS:
-- Evil Soul Subjugation --
Details (subject to change).
-- Waves in Forest of Monsters --
Details (subject to change).
-- Tower of Origin --
submitted by SimplyBartz05 to gachagaming [link] [comments]


2023.03.28 14:40 dreftzg [Daily News] Watches And Wonders, Day 2. Chrono JLC Reverso, Stunning Patek Enamel Dial, Retrograde Spreads Through The Vacheron Line and Oris Creates a Real Kermit

It's Tuesday and the second day of Watches and Wonders. Most of the reveals took place yesterday, some after I posted and some just didn't fit in the post. So here we go, a roundup of everything that's happening at Watches and Wonders, a bit shorter, but with more watches.
Also, thank you everyone for the reactions to yesterday's post. A couple of huge rewards and all the comments were amazing! Hope you enjoy today's roundup:
Jaeger-LeCoultre Introduces the Reverso Tribute Chronograph, the Duoface Tourbillon and Colors For the Reverso Small Seconds
Patek Philippe Introduces The 5178G-012, A Stunning Minute Repeater With a Flinqué Enamel Dial
Vacheron Constantin Introduces Three New Retrograde Models In The Traditionelle, Overseas, And Patrimony Collections, As Well As New Sizes
Chopard Shows Off The Ultra-Thin, Salmon Dial Chopard Alpine Eagle 41 XPS, the Alpine Eagle Cadence 8HF in Titanium, the L.U.C 1860 In Steel And A Crazy Imperiale High Jewellery Watch
The New Oris ProPilot Altimeter Is Back Thinner Than Ever, And An Official Kermit Watch
Parmigiani Fleurier Flys Under The Radar With A Slew Of Very Interesting New Watches
Hublot Announces A LOT Of Watches. No, Really… 17 New Pieces
Beloved Independent Czapek Introduces A Skeleton Antarctique Révélation
The New Ulysse Nardin Freak ONE Adds Boost To The Brand’s Futurist Mission
Frederique Constant Offers An Apology With A Real Tourbillon
Laurent Ferrier Introduces The Classic And Square Micro-Rotor Watches In Evergreen
F.P. Journe Delivers Biggest Joke Watch Of Watches & Wonders
Kudoke Introduces the Kudoke 3
The Hamilton Wandering Earth II Is A Limited And Off-The-Wall Chinese Movie Tie-In With A More Tame Version For The Rest Of Us
The Louis Erard Excellence Marqueterie Is Likely Your Cheapest Way To A Handmade Marquetry Dial, If You Can Get It
De Bethune are releasing its 31st in-house calibre in the DB Eight Chronograph Monopusher At An Eyewatering Price
The Byrne GyroDial Zero Is Very Funky, Very 70s. Very Futuristic And Very Cool
-------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like to receive some additional watch-adjacent content, as well as this news overview, every morning Monday-Friday in the form of a newsletter feel free to subscribe. However, there is absolutely no need for you to subscribe, as all the news from the newsletter is posted here. It is only if you want to receive a couple of daily links that are not strictly watch-related and want to get this news overview in your inbox.
submitted by dreftzg to Watches [link] [comments]


2023.03.28 13:17 PerniciousPickle859 Citizens for Sound Money (C4SM) & Kinesis Part IV

Citizens for Sound Money (C4SM) & Kinesis Part IV
See previous posts 1, 2 & 3 for background.
This is becoming a bit too crazy to believe. Is C4SM nothing more than a front for Kinesis?
Citizens for Sound Money acts as a market maker and promoter of Kinesis Velocity Token (KVT) securities while registered as a 501(c)(4) tax-exempt organization.
Citizens for Sound Money 501(c)(4) Adult Education & Social Welfare Organization
What does market marking and sale of securities issued by offshore foreign private for profit companies have to do with education and social welfare? Is this an activity that deserves tax exemption? Is it an activity allowed to receive tax exemption?
Besides being way outside of the stated mission, it looks illegal according to SEC rule 144.
OUR MISSION
To promote the adoption and use of sound money, sound monetary policy, and fair trading for sound money related assets.
To provide ongoing representation for individuals and entities using or providing services related to sound money to influence policy at any level of government
As a centralized private for profit company with a centralized private blockchain Kinesis is definitely not sound money and has nothing to do with it. They are big on the World Economic Forum so if you're into that sort of thing Kinesis is a top choice. Centralized authority is the opposite of sound money and sound monetary policy.
Looking only at the 5 conditions of rule 144 there are multiple violations.
1. Holding Period. Before you may sell any restricted securities in the marketplace, you must hold them for a certain period of time. If the company that issued the securities is a “reporting company” in that it is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, then you must hold the securities for at least six months. If the issuer of the securities is not subject to the reporting requirements, then you must hold the securities for at least one year. The relevant holding period begins when the securities were bought and fully paid for. The holding period only applies to restricted securities. Because securities acquired in the public market are not restricted, there is no holding period for an affiliate who purchases securities of the issuer in the marketplace. But the resale of an affiliate's shares as control securities is subject to the other conditions of the rule.
Are all the KVT securities being sold by C4SM held for the minimum holding period? Unknown.
2. Current Public Information. There must be adequate current information about the issuing company publicly available before the sale can be made. For reporting companies, this generally means that the companies have complied with the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For non-reporting companies, this means that certain company information, including information regarding the nature of its business, the identity of its officers and directors, and its financial statements, is publicly available.
Kinesis Money (Kinesis Cayman) and related entities do not provide financial statements to the public. Clear violation for condition 2.
3. Trading Volume Formula. If you are an affiliate, the number of equity securities you may sell during any three-month period cannot exceed the greater of 1% of the outstanding shares of the same class being sold, or if the class is listed on a stock exchange, the greater of 1% or the average reported weekly trading volume during the four weeks preceding the filing of a notice of sale on Form 144. Over-the-counter stocks, including those quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and the Pink Sheets, can only be sold using the 1% measurement.
Not enough information available to determine.
4. Ordinary Brokerage Transactions. If you are an affiliate, the sales must be handled in all respects as routine trading transactions, and brokers may not receive more than a normal commission. Neither the seller nor the broker can solicit orders to buy the securities.
Are Jim Forsythe, Marian Ward or Citizens for Sound Money brokers? Doesn't that require licenses or registrations?
Jim Forsythe says he's an accredited investor but does not look like he ever completed the lengthy process required to actually become an accredited investor. Simply being an accredited investor doesn't make you broker.
There is clear solicitation going on. Just look!

https://twitter.com/JimForsythe5/status/1397190829249339394
https://twitter.com/4SoundMoney/status/1452657836454985734
https://twitter.com/JimForsythe5/status/1639413487028895744
If that's not solicitation what would be?
5. Filing a Notice of Proposed Sale With the SEC. If you are an affiliate, you must file a notice with the SEC on Form 144 if the sale involves more than 5,000 shares or the aggregate dollar amount is greater than $50,000 in any three-month period.
Has C4SM sold more than $50K of KVT in any 3 month period? Unknown but likely. On u/retire-early's website aboutkinesis.com he talks about Citizens for Sound Money attracting 400 new holders. That's a likely minimum of over $400,000 in transaction volume. Citizens for Sound Money has been around for about 2 years which is eight 3 month periods. This makes it almost certain they would have exceeded $50K in a 3 month period.
Is it legal to help investors avoid accredited investor rules?
IRS filings indicate C4SM has over $600,000 revenue for their first nine months and accumulated assets over $500,000.

C4SM revenue & assets from GuideStar
Violation of condition 5? Likely
And what about this: Jim Forsythe (forsytjr2 JimForsythe5) the chairman of C4SM says the executive director of C4SM Marian Ward's (RedSilverfox1913 redsilver_fox) salary is paid by Kinesis referral fees.

https://preview.redd.it/ul5wz00tjgqa1.png?width=306&format=png&auto=webp&s=5a00ea220a08b6a89440a8eb82030ea4434f0705
Everyone should take note of how much effort Citizens for Sound Money puts into marketing Kinesis in addition to market making and sales of Kinesis KVT security tokens.
KVT token markets and prices are manipulated because Kinesis only allows buying but not selling of KVT. The price of KVT would surely plummet in a free market because four years in the yield has been $0.00 while Kinesis sold investors a $8,500 return per token per year by year 3.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQeFFGnneJE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQeFFGnneJE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQeFFGnneJE
Kinesis KVT market is manipulated
Kinesis is now claiming KVT have not declined in value but have actually almost doubled. If this is not market manipulation what would be?
Edit: u/Forsytjr2 is telling people below that KVT are not securities. KVT are securities. Here is the SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1762577/000176257719000002/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml
Kinesis Cayman Ltd SEC filings
Kinesis Cayman Ltd Form D
Here is the Kinesis offering memorandum for KVT security tokens https://kinesis.money/resources/Kinesis-Offering-Memorandum.pdf

Kinesis Offering Memorandum page 4
Kinesis Offering Memorandum page 5

Kinesis Offering Memorandum page 29
Kinesis Offering Memorandum page 79
Are Forsytjr2's lies below an indication that he knows that he and Citizens for Sound Money violated securities laws? How could someone that claims to have taken the series 65 test think these are not securities? The SEC filings say they are securities. The offering memorandum says they are securities. You have to be really stupid to come up with the story that they're not really securities.
It's 110% clear that KVT tokens are securities. What's not clear is how anyone conclude that KAG and KAU are not securities also. KAG and KAU receive yield that is created in the same way as KVT.
The Supreme Court established four criteria to determine whether an investment contract exists. According to the Howey Test, an investment contract is:
1 An investment of money
2 In a common enterprise
3 With the expectation of profit
4 To be derived from the efforts of others
All of these conditions are clearly met by all three Kinesis tokens.
1 Investment of money - yes, Kinesis accepts fait currencies for their tokens
2 In a common enterprise - Kinesis Cayman Ltd is a private for profit company "a common enterprise"
3 With the expectation of profit - yes, look at all the shill posts, they can't shut up about these yields
4 To be derived from the efforts of others - more Kinesis users equals more yields, both the management of the Kinesis Cayman Ltd and all these shills try to sucker more people into Kinesis to create more yield. No efforts of others means no users means no yields.
Text book case for securities.
https://preview.redd.it/7ywzq0ct7vqa1.png?width=1238&format=png&auto=webp&s=958bc8b2261af280fb1bb72c0a17a842bfd40a5b
There is no logic behind that.
https://preview.redd.it/7am2m59e8vqa1.png?width=1174&format=png&auto=webp&s=cf6e01a32d92413a242c0604dd7b61a44165d054
Here is the Twitter space Forsytjr2 is referring to broken down by Crypto Informer. Why does Forsytjr2 even mention this space? It looks terrible for him and Kinesis.
Who is the lawyer dumb enough to go on record saying KVT is not a security when the SEC filings and offering memorandum clearly state KVT is a security? Is it the DUI lawyers Kinesis paid in KVT?
submitted by PerniciousPickle859 to SilverDegenClub [link] [comments]


2023.03.28 02:54 DaMemes21 Nash should make this for stream ngl

Nash should make this for stream ngl submitted by DaMemes21 to millnash [link] [comments]


2023.03.28 00:15 Nic_Cag3 [US-CA][H] Long List - PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, Vita, Switch, NES, SNES, Famicom/SFC, Wii, Xbox, Dreamcast, Saturn, Virtual Boy, etc. [W] PayPal

Hallo! Quick album here :)
GAMES
PS VITA
  • Hakuoki Kyoto Winds Limited Edition (sealed) - 90
  • Hyperdimension Neptunia: PP - 40
  • Operation Abyss: New Tokyo Legacy Collector's Edition (sealed) - 75
  • Sense: A Cyberpunk Story Limited Edition (sealed) - 155
  • Silent Hill Book of Memories (cart) - 50
  • Ys Origins Collector's Edition (LRG - sealed) - 85
PLAYSTATION
  • Batman & Robin - 40
  • Bugs Bunny Lost in Time - 45
  • Fatal Fury Wild Ambition - 65
  • Iron Soldier 3 - 20
  • RC de Go - 35
  • Thrasher Skate and Destroy - 30
  • Wipeout - 30
  • World's Scariest Police Chases - 12
PS2
  • Capcom Fighting Evolution - 18
  • Choro Q - 15
  • Silpheed The Lost Planet - 25
  • Sonic Heroes - 10
  • Taz Wanted - 10
  • The Simpsons Skateboarding (no manual) - 12
  • Ultimate Ninja 4: Naruto Shipuden (no manual) - 18
PS3
  • Hyperdimension Neptunia Premium Edition - 70
  • Testament of Sherlock Holmes - 30
  • Xblaze Lost Memories (sealed) - 35
PLAYSTATION 4
  • Black Clover Quartet Knights - 14
  • Call of Duty Infinite Warfare Legacy Edition - 6
  • Daymare 1998 - 12
  • Dead Alliance - 6
  • DeFormers - 14
  • Dirt Rally II - 25
  • Don't Knock Twice - 37
  • Grand Kingdom - 20
  • Hot Shot Racing - 15
  • Lost Sphear - 65
  • New Gundam Breaker - 12
  • Penguin Wars - 12
  • Radial-G: Racing Revolved - 30
  • Redout Lightspeed Edition - 8
  • Root Film - 30
  • Space Hulk: Ascension - 5
  • Star Wars Battlefront II Elite Trooper Deluxe Edition - 5
  • The Legend of Heroes Trails of Cold Steel III - 20
  • Two Point Hospital - 12
  • Yomawari Midnight Shadows - 60
  • Warriors Orochi 4 - 12
Sealed
  • Gungrave VR (sealed) - 30
  • Shantae 1/2 Genie Hero (sealed) - 25
  • Disaster Report 4 (sealed) - 30
  • Doom 3 VR Edition (sealed) - 9
  • Home Sweet Home (sealed) - 40
  • Jotun by LRG (sealed) - 35
  • Omen of Sorrow (sealed) - 16
  • Shakedown Hawaii (sealed) - 26
  • Yakuza Like A Dragon (sealed) - 15
  • Yakuza Like A Dragon Day Ichii Edition w/ Best Buy Steelbook (sealed) - 30
  • Ys VIII Lacrimosa of Dana (sealed) - 40
Limited/Collectors Editions
  • Azur Lane Crosswave Limited Edition (Sealed) - 115
  • Cyrpt of the Necrodancer Collector's Edition (Sealed) - 40
  • Disgaea 1 Complete Rosen Queen's Finest Limited Edition - 155
  • Granblue Fantasy Versus Limited Edition (Sealed) - 55
  • Night Trap Collector's Edition by LRG (Sealed) - 80
  • Nioh 2 Special Edition (Open Box) - 25
  • Robotics Notes Elite Dash (Open Box) - 35
  • Sakura of Rice & Ruin Divine Edition (Sealed) - 50
  • Senran Kagura Burst Renewal (Sealed) - 55
  • Shenmue III Collector's Edition by LRG (Sealed) - 120
  • Shining Resonance Launch Edition (Sealed) - 35
  • Star Wars Bounty Hunter Collector's Edition by LRG (Sealed) - 165
  • Void Terrarium Limited Edition (Sealed) - 50
  • Wonder Boy Dragon's Trap Limited Edition by LRG (Sealed) - 75
NINTENDO SWITCH
  • Crypt of the Necro Dancer Collector's Edition (Sealed) - 50
  • Gunlord X Limited Edition - 130
  • Skullgirls Encore Vinyl Bundle LE (Sealed) - 140
  • Monster Boy Cursed Kingdom - 65
  • Override 2 Deluxe - 12
  • Disaster Report 4 - 20
  • Cave Story 3D - 25
  • Langrisser I & II (sealed) - 70
  • Raiden IV x Mikado Remix (sealed) - 25
  • Retro City Rampage DX CE w/ Extras (sealed) - 185
FAMICOM
  • Lot of 12 games (listed below) - $85
  • Star Force
  • Bokosuka Wars
  • Nekketsu High School Dodgeball
  • Pinball
  • Dragon Quest II
  • Best Play Baseball Special
  • SWAT
  • Final Fantasy III
  • Baseball
  • Super Xevious
  • Hyper Olympic
  • City Adventure Touch: Mystery of Triangle
TURBOGRAFX/PC ENGINE
  • Pac-Land - 40
  • Talespin - 65
  • Bull Fight Boxing (PC-Engine) - 15
  • Down Load (PC-Engine) - 95
  • F1 Triple Battle (PC-Engine) - 15
  • Image Fight (PC-Engine) - 55
  • Tatsunoko Fighter (PC-Engine) - 35
SEGA GENESIS
  • Complete in Box below:
  • Ariel the Little Mermaid (cardboard variant) - 20
  • Super Off Road (cardboard variant) - 28
  • Zany Golf (cardboard variant, damaged) - 15
  • Combat Cars (cardboard variant) - 9
  • Eternal Champions - 12
  • F22 Interceptor - 7
  • Jeopardy - 7
  • Risk - 8
  • PGA European Tour - 7
  • Winter Olympic Games - 7
  • ----------
  • Boxed, but no manuals below:
  • Space Harrier II - 19
  • Mercs - 27
  • Radical Rex - 30
  • Robocop 3 (faded cover) - 15
  • Golden Axe II - 29
  • Shining in the Darkness - 29
  • WWF Royal Rumble - 10
  • Championship Pool - 7
  • Sports Talk Baseball - 4
  • The Revenge of Shinobi - 30
  • Lotus II - 7
  • Virtual Bart - 39
  • Starflight - 25
  • Road Rash II - 15
  • Dynamite Headdy - 35
  • Columns - 7
  • Tecmo Super Baseball - 10
  • NFL Football 94 Starring Joe Montana - 5
SEGA SATURN/SEGA CD
  • JPN Burning Rangers - 60
  • JPN Mobile Suit Gundam Side Story III - 15
  • JPN Snatcher - 45
  • JPN Wachenroder - 25
  • JPN Puyopuyo Two - 12
  • JPN ikkyou Pawerful Puroyakyu '95 Kaimakusan - 12
  • JPN Decathlete - 12
  • JPN The King of Fighters '97 - 15
  • JPN Dead or Alive - 22
  • JPN Lupin The 3rd The Sage of Pyramid - 35
  • JPN The King of Fighters '96 Limited Edition - 30
  • JPN X-Men vs Street Fighter Limited Edition (w/ Ram Cart) - 80
  • NA Bust A Move 2 - 25
  • NA Formula 1 - 8
  • NA Midnight Raiders - 25
SEGA DREAMCAST
  • JPN The House of the Dead 2 - 12
  • JPN Silent Scope - 20
  • JPN Psychic Force 2012 - 9
  • JPN Mobile Suit Gundam Side Story - 20
  • JPN Shanghai Dynasty - 15
  • JPN F1 World Grand Prix - 9
  • JPN DDR 2nd Mix - 7
  • JPN Cyber Troopers Virtual On - 15
  • JPN Marionette Handler 2 - 15
  • JPN Culdcept Second - 9
  • JPN Pier Solar - 55
  • JPN Super Speed Racing - 7
  • NA Demolition Racer No Exit - 12
  • NA Sega Marine Fishing (sealed) - 25
  • NA Draconus (w/ custom box) - 30
  • NA Conflict Zone (no cover) - 10
VIRTUAL BOY
  • Mario's Tennis - 15
  • Nester's Funky Bowling w/ Manual - 90
  • Red Alarm (box w/ manual, no game) - 35
SYSTEMS
Photos
  • Original Xbox Halo Edition (Green) - 235
  • Virtual Boy w/ Box and Mario's Tennis - 400
  • PS2 Slim White - 105
  • NES Classic (New) - 100
  • SNES Classic (New) - 110
p.s. Post is a work in progress. If you a game pictured but not listed, comment below and I will provide a price.
submitted by Nic_Cag3 to GameSale [link] [comments]