How much does tammy weigh now

Not much to say, but to thank mainly the discord community for being helpful and friendly these past few months. It felt like a small family.
I've seen a lot of people playing until the last minute the servers go down, so that might show the devs how everyone feels for the game, now that is being shut down. The product is good, it just needed more promoting and bug fixing.
It was nice to play with everyone, take care!
PD: Formerly known as Lameloscocos, just a word game with Lamelo Ball's name with spanish words.

I plan to present a series of posts looking at damage and action economy of the martial melee classes across levels 1-20. This is not an optimization guide looking at all the nitty gritty details of weapon selection and such. I am sure you can present cases that provide options with better damage. Here, we are mainly looking at general class progression and how feat/class ability choices impact damage and action economy. Previously, I presented the damage of attacks a function of MAP (Objective Value of Third Actions: How to quantify : Pathfinder2e (reddit.com)), here we expand on that analysis to look at how these translate into actual damage and how feats/class abilities affect the more general results.
Most of the simulations are performed with the amazing calculator by Ben Halbach (Pathfinder Damage Calculator PF 2e build dpr compare tool (bahalbach.github.io)), and graphs are generated using his website. I believe he (or maybe someone using his tool) did an analysis of damage of some classic build options ( Expected damage comparisons by level : Pathfinder2e (reddit.com) ). The focus here is to look a bit more into the feats and the value of individual actions. There can certainly be mistakes.
The baseline assumption is that the character will start with an 18 in their attack/damage statistic, the foe is equal level with high AC and moderate saves (Based on the Creature Building Rules). Progression of potency and striking runes are based on Automatic Bonus Progression, and weapon property runes that add to the damage are included at level-appropriate times. We will use a single Strike (MAP 0) by a Fighter with a d12 weapon as a baseline for all damage comparisons. The expected damage at each level for the baseline is presented in the following figure.
Baseline Damage Curve
All damage will be presented as a % of this baseline damage. For example, we might say that an attack does 50% of the baseline damage, so to get the real damage at a specific level, multiply the % by the value presented in the graph above.
Fighter
Tl;dr; General Two-Handed and Free-Handed Fighters do slightly more expected damage than Dual-Wielding Fighters until high level. Fighters have a number of feats that improve the value of second and third attacks. Their second attack can be very strong for all these builds, and the third attack also has decent value. The Dual-Wield Fighter at high level has the strongest third attack, so if you want to play a class that just keeps attacking, that might be an appealing build.
For Fighter, we look at three different builds: two-handed, free-handed, and dual-wielding.
The Fighter does not have much feat support for only 1 attack action in a turn. Many of the feats have the press trait. For two-handed Fighters, we will assume a d12 weapon. For free-handed weapon users (1 weapon, 1 free hand), we will assume a d8 (Two-handed d12) weapon, like a Bastard Sword. They can use Dual-Handed Assault to increase damage to that of a d14 weapon (two-handed d12), or they can use Snagging strike to make the enemy flat-footed to help out their subsequent attacks or teammates. Note that Dual-Handed Assault is a level 4 feat. Dual-wielders suffer the most as they are stuck with a d8 or d6 weapon as Double Slice requires two actions. A comparison of the damage is provided in Figure 2.1. The Two-Handed fighter is the highest damage until Dual-Handed Assault is acquired at level 4.
​
Figure 2.1 Damage of Fighter with Single Action. Target level = PC level
Next, we add a second attack action. To compare the options, we took a simple approach. We calculate the expected damage for various actions assuming they are the second attack action in a turn.
For two-handed Fighters, we considered a second strike, Advantageous Assault, Certain Strike, Brutal Finish, and the additional damage that would be granted if this were the second action of a Power Attack. Power Attack is the worst of these options (assuming that it is not being used to overcome damage resistance), adding around 40% baseline damage. A second strike adds approximately 55% baseline damage. Advantageous Assault, Certain Strike, and Furious Finish are all similar in damage, around 70-80% damage of the baseline, and they all remain similar for target level +/-2. Note, we include Advantageous Assault mainly to see its value if the target has the conditions for it be used (compared to Certain Strike for example), but we do not consider how to apply the condition.
​
Figure 2.2. Damage of Two-Handed Fighter with their second action. Target level = PC level
Next, we look at 2 actions for the free-handed Fighter as shown in Figure 2.3. Certain Strike provided ~60% of the baseline damage, Advantageous Assault ~55%, and a second strike ~45%. While Snagging Strike provides lower damage than Dual-Handed Assault for the first attack, it can apply the flat-footed condition. The sequence Snagging Strike -> Certain Strike is still approximately 15% lower damage than the sequence Dual-Handed Strike -> Certain Strike. We did not consider Combat Grab here because it does not increase raw damage, but it provides good tactical value.
Compared with two-handed fighters, the Dual-Handed Assault with two-handed d12 weapon provides strong value such that the expected damage of the free-handed Fighter’s two-action sequence is comparable to the two-handed Fighter.
Figure 2.3. Damage of Free-Handed Fighter with their second action. Target level = PC level
Next, we consider dual-wielding Fighters. At low levels, using Double Slice as the first action provides much better damage than any of the other two-action sequences considered, with the second attack in Double Slice adding 70-80% of baseline damage. At high levels, Strike -> Two-Weapon Flurry with either d6 agile d6 agile or d8 d6 agile and Agile Grace provides slightly higher (<5%) damage than Double Slice d8 d6 agile, but it does not have the advantage (or disadvantage) of adding the dice before applying weakness (or resistance).
Figure 2.4. Damage of Dual-Wielding Fighter with their second action. Target level = PC level
Adding the damage of the first and second actions, we see that two-handed Fighter and free-handed Fighter are very similar in damage, about 170% of the baseline (two-handed slightly ahead). Dual-wielding fighter is slightly behind, by about ~10% of baseline damage.
Finally, we arrive at the three-action scenario. The expected value of a third attack is low relative to the first attack. However, there are feats that can improve the value of the third attack action.
Things are becoming a bit complicated. We have two additional feats to consider, Exacting Strike and Furious Focus. First, we will ignore those feats. In Figure 2.5 we show possible third actions, which includes Advantageous Assault, Certain Strike, Brutal Finish, a Strike, and the additional damage if the second attack was Power Attack. Striking was the worst second action and the additional damage from Power Attack is the lowest damage here. That means that of the actions considered, Power Attacking as a second action is the worst option. A second action Power Attack is comparable to striking twice at MAP 1x-5 and MAP 2x-5. Advantageous Assault, Certain Strike, and Brutal Finish are all similar damage with one another, about 40% of the baseline damage.
Figure 2.5. Damage of Two-Handed Fighter with their third action. Target level = PC level
How would Furious Focus change these results (see Figure 2.6)? The trade-off is pretty simple, is the value of Power Attack (MAP 0) plus one of the MAP 1x-5 actions more than that of taking an action each at MAP 0, 1x-5, and 2x-5. Power Attack (MAP 0) was worth around 150% of baseline damage and the MAP 1x-5 actions (Certain Strike, Advantageous Assault, Brutal Finish) were worth around 70-80% of baseline damage for a total of ~210-220% of baseline damage. The sum of the three actions is about 210% baseline damage (MAP 0 100%, MAP 1x-5 70%, and MAP 2x-5 40%). Essentially, Power Attack (Furious Focus) -> Brutal Finish/Certain Strike is similar value as Strike -> Certain Strike -> Brutal Finish/Certain Strike. The Strike -> Certain Strike -> Certain Strike option takes only a single feat, whereas the other option takes 3 feats.
Next, let us consider Exacting Strike. The damage of a second action Exacting Strike is about 55% of baseline damage. If Exacting Strike fails, but not critically fails, then the MAP does not increase and the damage of the third action can be given by the damage of one of the MAP 1x-5 actions already discussed. The value of these second actions were 70-80% of the baseline damage. However, we cannot simply add those values because we need to account for the probability of the second action failing or succeeding.
In Figure 2.6 we compare the results of Exacting Strike with Furious Focus Power Attacks and the Strike -> Certain Strike -> Certain Strike sequence. Overall, the value of Strike -> Exacting Strike -> Certain Strike is comparable to Strike -> Certain Strike -> Certain Strike as well as Power Attack (Furious Focus) -> Certain Strike. From a feat cost perspective, Strike -> Certain Strike -> Certain Strike has the lowest cost. However, Exacting Strike provides some utility at the mid level range before you obtain Certain Strike. Exacting Strike also provides flexibility in actions because you can choose not to make the third attack if the Exacting Strike succeeds. For both of these reasons, our recommendation would be to skip Power Attack and Furious Focus and instead obtain Exacting Strike and Certain Strike. The Power Attack (Furious Focus) sequence provides similar damage, but is less flexible and has lower value if you only want to use two actions to attack.
Figure 2.6. Damage of Two-Handed Fighter three action combos. Target level = PC level.
Next, we move on to the three-action sequences for the free-handed Fighter. Figure 2.7 shows the expected damage of third attack actions versus the baseline. A MAP 2x-5 strike provides 20-25% of the baseline damage and Certain Strike increases the expected damage to about 35-40%.
Figure 2.7. Expected damage of third attack actions for free-handed Fighter. Target level = PC level
Figure 2.8 shows the overall expected damage of some three-action sequences – this is particularly important to assess the value of Snagging Strike. Overall, the free-handed Fighter does about 10% less damage than the two-handed Fighter for the three-action sequence. Dual-Handed Assault with a two-handed d12 weapon is only about a 10% damage increase over Snagging Strike sequence when considering a three-action sequence because the value of the two-handed d12 property only applies to the first attack in the sequence. We did not consider Combat Grab here because it does not increase raw damage, but it provides good tactical value.
Figure 2.8. Expected damage of three-action sequences for free-handed Fighter. Target level = PC level
Finally, we examine third actions for the dual-wielding Fighter. Figure 2.9 shows a comparison of various options. We see that the value of the third action starts low and grows massively at level 14 when Two-Weapon Flurry is obtained, and again at 16 when Graceful Poise is obtained.
Figure 2.9. Expected damage of third attack actions for dual-wielding Fighter. Target level = PC level
In Figure 2.10, we plot the expected damage of the three action sequences at various levels based on the results of Figure 2.9. Dual-wielding is slightly behind Two-Handed Fighters until very high level (>14) when dual-wielding provides about 10% damage increase over two-handed and free-handed Fighters.
Figure 2.10. Expected damage of three action sequences for dual-wielding Fighter. Target level = PC level